Claims

Senior secondary Geography students taught with PowerPoint presentation scored significantly higher on post-test achievement than students taught with the lecture method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a non-randomized pre-test-post-test quasi-experiment, the PowerPoint group's post-test mean (33.17) exceeded the lecture group's (29.82), a statistically significant difference. → Onivehu and Ohawuiro 2018

Evidence

Onivehu and Ohawuiro 2018

Adams Ogirima Onivehu, Onyiyeche Emilia Ohawuiro. (2018). Effect of PowerPoint Presentation on Students' Cognitive Achievement in Geography. Romanian Review of Geographical Education, VII(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.23741/RRGE120184

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of two intact classes of 45 senior secondary two students each in Ilorin, Nigeria; experimental group taught selected Geography concepts with PowerPoint, control with chalkboard lecture. The article reports "a significant difference between the scores of both groups (t (88)=8.34, p<.005)". No effect size is printed.

"the mean score of the experimental group was higher than the mean score of the control group. These results show that there is a significant difference between the scores of both groups (t (88)=8.34, p<.005) after instruction."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.