Pre-monitoring and retrospective confidence judgments are highly consistent, with most agreement at the highest scale level regardless of correctness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? 68.1% of confidence judgments matched the pre-monitoring judgment, with 63.9% total agreement at the highest rating, and the pattern was equivalent for correct and incorrect answers. → Sophie Wacker 2024
Evidence¶
Sophie Wacker 2024¶
Sophie Wacker, Claudia M. Roebers. (2024). Motivating children to (pre)monitor: positive effects on monitoring accuracy? Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09351-0
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Post hoc descriptive comparison of pre-monitoring and confidence judgments. "The diagonal of agreements adds up to 68.1% of all monitoring judgments"; for the highest rating, agreement was 63.9%, and the pattern was equivalent for correct and incorrect recognition.
"The diagonal of agreements adds up to 68.1% of all monitoring judgments."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Children's recognition choices overwhelmingly follow the alternative given the highest pre-monitoring judgment — related
- The literature is mixed on age differences in the accuracy of retrospective confidence judgments during recognition memory tests, with older adults sometimes producing more high-confidence false alarms and poorer resolution with deceptive lures — related
- Adults' confidence judgments track answer accuracy: confidence is higher on correct than incorrect general-knowledge trials (metacognitive monitoring) — related
- A minority of item judgments show downregulation of confidence after pre-monitoring, suggesting differentiated evaluation can sometimes trigger more accurate monitoring — related
- Fourth graders monitor and control answers to open-ended questions more accurately than second graders, but no significant age difference was found for true-false questions — related
- All children in the study showed adequate metacognitive processes before and during test taking — related
- In retrospective within-subject comparison, no core metric distinguished synthesized TTS narration from recorded instructor voice, and equivalence testing supported non-inferiority — related
- Monitoring accuracy interventions are more effective for retrospective confidence judgments than for judgments of learning — related
- Children judge correctly at a high rate on two-alternative concrete judgment items even in the youngest age groups — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pre-monitoring-confidence-judgment-consistency |
title |
Pre-monitoring and retrospective confidence judgments are highly consistent, with most agreement at the highest scale level regardless of correctness |
description |
Pre-monitoring and retrospective confidence judgments are highly consistent, with most agreement at the highest scale level regardless of correctness |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sophie-wacker-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.