Claims

Both groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test in the local history learning activities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Paired sample t-tests showed significant pre-to-post gains in both the experimental group (67.48 to 83.26) and the control group (69.90 to 75.33), with p less than 0.001. → Chang 2018

Evidence

Chang 2018

Chang, Chiu, and Huang. (2018). A Sharing Mind Map-oriented Approach to Enhance Collaborative Mobile Learning With Digital Archiving Systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1174044

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired sample t-tests (Table 2) on pre-test and post-test scores: experimental group means 67.48 and 83.26 (N=31), control group means 69.90 and 75.33 (N=30), both with significance .000; the 95% confidence bounds did not include 0.

"The analysis for value of p was less than 0.001, showing significant difference in the average score of the two groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.