Experimental and control groups were academically equivalent on the organic chemistry achievement test before the treatment¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Pre-test mean scores of 11.73 (control) and 11.37 (experimental) showed no significant difference between groups before instruction (t = -1.162, Sig = 0.249). → Nawaf Ahmad Hasan Samara 2016

Evidence¶

Nawaf Ahmad Hasan Samara 2016¶

Nawaf Ahmad Hasan Samara. (2016). Effectiveness of Analogy Instructional Strategy on Undergraduate Student's Acquisition of Organic Chemistry Concepts in Mutah University, Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(8). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095360

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t-test on NOCAT pre-test scores of the control (n=44, mean 11.73, SD 1.51) and experimental (n=38, mean 11.37, SD 1.28) groups. The article reports no significant pre-treatment difference; equivalence beyond this test was not established.

"The results revealed that (t = - 1.162, Sig = 0.249 > 0 .05) this result implies that there is no significa nt difference in the student’s achievement between both groups before the treatment."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Undergraduate students taught organic chemistry with an analogy instructional strategy achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught by traditional lecture methods — related
• The GCR and control groups were equivalent in grammar performance before treatment — related
• Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
• Before treatment, the Logo and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in achievement on two-dimensional shapes — related
• No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
• The pre-tested experimental group gained more on the Chemistry Achievement Test than the pre-tested control group — related
• Groups were equivalent in mathematics achievement before the application — related
• Before treatment, the experimental and control groups showed no significant difference in overall language proficiency — related
• Experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent in mathematics self-efficacy perceptions before the intervention — related
• The lecture and academic controversy groups showed no significant difference in TUCE pretest scores, indicating equivalent prior economic knowledge — related