Groups were equivalent in mathematics achievement before the application¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Pretest Achievement Test scores showed no significant difference between experimental and control groups. → İlknur Özpinar 2017
Evidence¶
İlknur Özpinar 2017¶
İlknur Özpinar, Semirhan Gö kç e, Arzu Aydoğan Yenmez. (2017). Effects of Digital Storytelling in Mathematics Instruction on Academic Achievement and Examination of Teacher-Student Opinions on the Process. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 5, No. 10. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i10.2595
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Pretest analysis of the 14-question Achievement Test in the quasi-experimental study found no significant group difference; control mean was 8.68 and experimental mean 8.47, indicating equivalent starting achievement.
"No significant difference was found between the groups by the achievement pretest scores [t (56)=.327, p>.05]. According to Table 3, the mean of the control group students obtained in the achievement pretest is X =8.68 and the mean of the experimental group students obtained in the same test is X =8.47."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in pre-test science achievement before the intervention — related
- Experimental and control groups were academically equivalent on the organic chemistry achievement test before the treatment — related
- The three groups were equivalent on EPT pre-test scores before the intervention — related
- Experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent on religious-concepts pretest before the intervention — related
- Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
- The GCR and control groups were equivalent in grammar performance before treatment — related
- No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
- The experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in programming knowledge at pretest — related
- The music and non-music groups did not differ significantly on the mathematics achievement pretest — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.