Claims

Groups were equivalent in mathematics achievement before the application

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pretest Achievement Test scores showed no significant difference between experimental and control groups. → İlknur Özpinar 2017

Evidence

İlknur Özpinar 2017

İlknur Özpinar, Semirhan Gö kç e, Arzu Aydoğan Yenmez. (2017). Effects of Digital Storytelling in Mathematics Instruction on Academic Achievement and Examination of Teacher-Student Opinions on the Process. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 5, No. 10. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i10.2595

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest analysis of the 14-question Achievement Test in the quasi-experimental study found no significant group difference; control mean was 8.68 and experimental mean 8.47, indicating equivalent starting achievement.

"No significant difference was found between the groups by the achievement pretest scores [t (56)=.327, p>.05]. According to Table 3, the mean of the control group students obtained in the achievement pretest is X =8.68 and the mean of the experimental group students obtained in the same test is X =8.47."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.