PBL and traditional teaching do not differ significantly in their effect on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A two-way ANOVA found no significant difference between pre-test–post-test CCTDI scores according to teaching method (PBL vs traditional). → Temel 2014
Evidence¶
Temel 2014¶
Senar Temel. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), Art. #769. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1136398
q3 · i? · causal · r1
True experimental pre-test–post-test control group study; 49 pre-service teachers randomly assigned to PBL (n = 22) or traditional teaching (n = 27) for the acid-base topic. The two-way ANOVA on CCTDI scores showed "no significant difference" between methods (F = 0.192, p = 0.664); no effect size was printed.
"no significant difference was found between the pre-test and post-test CCTDI scores according to the different teaching methods implemented 1,47 (F = 0.192, p = 0.664)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- PBL and traditional teaching have different effects on pre-service teachers’ perceptions of problem-solving ability, with PBL more influential — related
- The PBL and traditional groups were equivalent on CCTDI and PSI at pre-test — related
- Non-traditional teaching methods significantly improve critical thinking dispositions in nursing students compared to control groups — related
- Pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions are generally low, with none scoring high on the CCTDI — related
- Experimental group's critical thinking disposition improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related
- Control group showed no statistically significant pre-test to post-test change in critical thinking disposition — related
- Descriptive means moved in opposite directions: the treatment group's critical thinking disposition mean rose while the control group's fell — related
- Moodle-based online argumentation implementation improved critical thinking disposition of science teacher candidates compared with a control group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.