Claims

The Pro-Bully Paradox: victimization relates to weaker anti-bullying attitudes, an effect largely specific to physical victimization

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Using a global victimization measure, OECD found students who were not frequently bullied reported stronger anti-bullying attitudes than frequently bullied students. → Herbert W. Marsh 2023 q2 i? Physical victimization correlated positively with pro-bully attitudes and negatively with pro-victim attitudes, a pattern evident only for the physical component. → Herbert W. Marsh 2023 (2)

Evidence

Herbert W. Marsh 2023

Herbert W. Marsh, Jiesi Guo, Philip D. Parker, Reinhard Pekrun, Geetanjali Basarkod, Theresa Dicke, et al. (2023). Peer Victimization: an Integrative Review and Cross-National Test of a Tripartite Model. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09765-x

q2 · i? · associational · r3

The review reports the OECD's PISA-based finding, from a global victimization measure, that "students who were not frequently bullied were more likely to report stronger anti-bullying attitudes" — victims had weaker, not stronger, anti-bullying attitudes. No effect size is printed.

"the OECD reported that “students who were not frequently bullied were more likely to report stronger anti-bullying attitudes” (OECD, 2019a, p. 46)."

Herbert W. Marsh 2023 (2)

Herbert W. Marsh, Jiesi Guo, Philip D. Parker, Reinhard Pekrun, Geetanjali Basarkod, Theresa Dicke, et al. (2023). Peer Victimization: an Integrative Review and Cross-National Test of a Tripartite Model. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09765-x

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The review attributes to Marsh et al. (2011) that "physical victimization positively correlated with pro-bully attitudes and negatively with pro-victim attitudes", with the pattern "only evident for the physical component"; pro-bully attitudes were nearly uncorrelated with relational and verbal victimization.

"physical victimization positively correlated with pro-bully attitudes and negatively with pro-victim attitudes. However, this pattern of relations was only evident for the physical component of victimization."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id pro-bully-paradox-physical-victimization
title The Pro-Bully Paradox: victimization relates to weaker anti-bullying attitudes, an effect largely specific to physical victimization
description The Pro-Bully Paradox: victimization relates to weaker anti-bullying attitudes, an effect largely specific to physical victimization
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — herbert-w-marsh-2023, herbert-w-marsh-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.