The Pro-Bully Paradox: victimization relates to weaker anti-bullying attitudes, an effect largely specific to physical victimization¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Using a global victimization measure, OECD found students who were not frequently bullied reported stronger anti-bullying attitudes than frequently bullied students. → Herbert W. Marsh 2023
q2 i? Physical victimization correlated positively with pro-bully attitudes and negatively with pro-victim attitudes, a pattern evident only for the physical component. → Herbert W. Marsh 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Herbert W. Marsh 2023¶
Herbert W. Marsh, Jiesi Guo, Philip D. Parker, Reinhard Pekrun, Geetanjali Basarkod, Theresa Dicke, et al. (2023). Peer Victimization: an Integrative Review and Cross-National Test of a Tripartite Model. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09765-x
q2 · i? · associational · r3
The review reports the OECD's PISA-based finding, from a global victimization measure, that "students who were not frequently bullied were more likely to report stronger anti-bullying attitudes" — victims had weaker, not stronger, anti-bullying attitudes. No effect size is printed.
"the OECD reported that “students who were not frequently bullied were more likely to report stronger anti-bullying attitudes” (OECD, 2019a, p. 46)."
Herbert W. Marsh 2023 (2)¶
Herbert W. Marsh, Jiesi Guo, Philip D. Parker, Reinhard Pekrun, Geetanjali Basarkod, Theresa Dicke, et al. (2023). Peer Victimization: an Integrative Review and Cross-National Test of a Tripartite Model. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09765-x
q2 · i? · associational · r2
The review attributes to Marsh et al. (2011) that "physical victimization positively correlated with pro-bully attitudes and negatively with pro-victim attitudes", with the pattern "only evident for the physical component"; pro-bully attitudes were nearly uncorrelated with relational and verbal victimization.
"physical victimization positively correlated with pro-bully attitudes and negatively with pro-victim attitudes. However, this pattern of relations was only evident for the physical component of victimization."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Safety — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Antibullying attitudes are positively related to disciplining bullies, victim support, parental involvement, and involving peer bystanders — related
- A three-component (tripartite) model of victimization shows superior explanatory power to unidimensional and two-component models in cross-national PISA2018 data — related
- Student-reported teacher intercultural attitudes positively predict school belonging and negatively predict victimization frequency — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pro-bully-paradox-physical-victimization |
title |
The Pro-Bully Paradox: victimization relates to weaker anti-bullying attitudes, an effect largely specific to physical victimization |
description |
The Pro-Bully Paradox: victimization relates to weaker anti-bullying attitudes, an effect largely specific to physical victimization |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — herbert-w-marsh-2023, herbert-w-marsh-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.