Claims

A three-component (tripartite) model of victimization shows superior explanatory power to unidimensional and two-component models in cross-national PISA2018 data

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2–r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across 77 countries, the three-component model outperformed competing one- and two-component victimization models in goodness-of-fit, component differentiation, and discriminant validity. → Herbert W. Marsh 2023 q3 i? The test used nationally representative samples of 594,196 fifteen-year-old students from 77 countries. → Herbert W. Marsh 2023 (2)

Evidence

Herbert W. Marsh 2023

Herbert W. Marsh, Jiesi Guo, Philip D. Parker, Reinhard Pekrun, Geetanjali Basarkod, Theresa Dicke, et al. (2023). Peer Victimization: an Integrative Review and Cross-National Test of a Tripartite Model. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09765-x

q3 · i? · associational · r3

The authors' own substantive-methodological synergy analysis compared five structural models (one-, two-, and three-component CFA and ESEM) in PISA2018 data and reports "the superior explanatory power of the three-component model" across fit, differentiation, and discriminant validity with gender, attitudes, and well-being. No effect size is printed for the model comparison.

"We demonstrate the superior explanatory power of the three-component model—goodness-of-fit, component differentiation, and discriminant validity of the three components concerning gender differences, paradoxical anti-bullying attitudes"

Herbert W. Marsh 2023 (2)

Herbert W. Marsh, Jiesi Guo, Philip D. Parker, Reinhard Pekrun, Geetanjali Basarkod, Theresa Dicke, et al. (2023). Peer Victimization: an Integrative Review and Cross-National Test of a Tripartite Model. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09765-x

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Methods section: the empirical test drew on "nationally representative samples from 77 countries (594,196 fifteen-year-old students)", a two-stage sampling design with survey weights; three countries lacking victimization data were excluded.

"The PISA2018 data are based on nationally representative samples from 77 countries (594,196 fifteen-year-old students)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tripartite-model-superior-fit-pisa2018
title A three-component (tripartite) model of victimization shows superior explanatory power to unidimensional and two-component models in cross-national PISA2018 data
description A three-component (tripartite) model of victimization shows superior explanatory power to unidimensional and two-component models in cross-national PISA2018 data
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — herbert-w-marsh-2023, herbert-w-marsh-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.