A training programme consolidating process training and task analysis improved maths achievement of female pupils with learning disorders more than ordinary teaching in KSA¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Female students with learning disorders taught with the consolidated process-training and task-analysis programme scored significantly higher on the post achievement test than the control group taught by ordinary methods. → Alenizi 2016
q2 i? The ANCOVA showed statistically significant differences in post-test achievement favouring the test group after controlling for the pre measurement. → Alenizi 2016
Evidence¶
Alenizi 2016¶
Mogbel Aid K Alenizi. (2016). Assessment of Conventional Teaching Procedures: Implications for Gifted Learners. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(3), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.3p.8
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Quasi-experiment with 65 female students with learning disorders (35 test, 30 control) in a KSA learning-disorders centre; the test group studied the statistics and probability unit with the training programme while the control used the ordinary method. The ANCOVA on post-test scores gave an F Value of 6.89 with statistical significance of 0.01, favouring the test group.
"Table 6 shows that there are statistically significant differences at the significance level of 0.05 following the group variables. They were in favour of the test group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Within the group learning treatment, female students achieved significantly higher mathematics post-test scores than male students — related
- Male students taught with the Target-Task Model significantly outperformed female students on the PTCE — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.