Male students taught with the Target-Task Model significantly outperformed female students on the PTCE¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? ANCOVA showed a significant gender difference in post-test scores of students taught with the Target-Task Model (Gender F = 4.819, p = .032), with males outperforming females. → Olaniyan 2015
Evidence¶
Olaniyan 2015¶
Olaniyan, A. O., & Omosewo, E. O. (2015). Effects of a Target-Task Problem-Solving Model on Senior Secondary School Students' Performance in Physics. Science Education International, 25(4), 522-538. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086539
q2 · i? · causal · r1
ANCOVA of post-test PTCE scores for the 60 experimental-group students by gender (29 male, 31 female). Gender F = 4.819, Sig. .032. Table 5 printed mean gains of 18.15 for males and 12.84 for females; the text states "The male students performed better than female students".
"The P value (.032) is less than the P alpha level of 0.050. (P<0.050), and shows that the null hypothesis needs to be rejected."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Gender does not significantly affect students' creative thinking in problem solving — related
- Male students taught algebraic expressions with games achieved significantly higher adjusted scores than female students — related
- Within the group learning treatment, female students achieved significantly higher mathematics post-test scores than male students — reports the opposite
- No significant gender difference in performance among undergraduates taught with blended learning — reports the opposite
- No significant difference in organic chemistry post-test achievement between male and female students irrespective of instructional method — reports the opposite
- Male and female students differ significantly in application of Light waves, favouring males — related
- Under the Target-Task Model, high, medium and low scoring students differed significantly in post-test performance, with low scorers showing the largest mean gain — related
- No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught Technical Drawing with PowerPoint presentation — reports the opposite
- Gender has no significant influence on mean achievement scores of students taught light and sound waves using guided inquiry teaching method — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.