Claims

Proctoring effects on exam performance are mixed, and technical difficulties and cheating were reported in open-book online exams

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? One study highlighted a negative impact of proctoring on performance and completion time, while another found no significant proctoring effect. → Mizori R 2025 q2 i? Technical challenges (hardware limitations, internet connectivity) affected performance and completion, and cheating was reported with distinct patterns in open-book and invigilated exams. → Mizori R 2025 (2)

Evidence

Mizori R 2025

Mizori R, Sadiq M, Ahmad MT, Siu A, Ahmad RR, Yang Z, et al. (2025). STEM exam performance: Open‐ versus closed‐book methods in the large language model era. The Clinical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13839

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Narrative review of included studies' proctoring findings. The review reports Daffin and Jones found proctoring negatively affected performance and time, whereas Balasubramanian et al. found no significant difference; the effect does not replicate across studies.

"Jr et al.'s 16 study highlighted the negative impact of proctoring on performance and time taken to complete exams. In contrast, Balasubramanian et al. did not find significant differences in exam performance due to proctoring."

Mizori R 2025 (2)

Mizori R, Sadiq M, Ahmad MT, Siu A, Ahmad RR, Yang Z, et al. (2025). STEM exam performance: Open‐ versus closed‐book methods in the large language model era. The Clinical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13839

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Narrative synthesis of practical issues in online OBE delivery. The review reports technical problems "sometimes leading to early submission" and cheating in Mohanna and Patel's study, with distinct patterns across exam types; measures included variability in exam questions.

"Problems ranged from hardware limitations to internet connectivity, sometimes leading to early submission and affecting student performance. Cheating was also reported in the study by Mohanna and Patel's study, with distinct patterns observed in open‐book and invigilated exams."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.