Proficiency-based training, including mastery learning, is effective for achieving competence in neuraxial access¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Proficiency-based training, including mastery learning, was an effective educational strategy used across all neuraxial space access procedures. → Nielsen Martine Siw 2025
Evidence¶
Nielsen Martine Siw 2025¶
Nielsen Martine Siw, Ilkjær Frederik Veitland, Grejs Anders Morten, Nielsen Anders Bo, Konge Lars, Brøchner Anne Craveiro. (2025). Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial space access: a scoping review of educational approaches to lumbar puncture, epidural anaesthesia, and spinal anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.06.008
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's discussion states that "Proficiency-based training was an effective educational strategy used across all neuraxial space access procedures", citing multiple included studies.
"Proficiency-based training was an effective educational strategy used across all neuraxial space access procedures."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learning curves: residents require roughly 45–90 attempts to achieve competency in neuraxial procedures — related
- Simulation-based training enhances outcomes across multiple Kirkpatrick levels in neuraxial space access education — related
- Skill retention after neuraxial technical training tends to decline over time — related
- Most included studies were of low methodological quality, with only 22 of 99 rated high quality by MERSQI — related
- Training fidelity: low-fidelity manikins performed comparably to high-fidelity manikins for epidural skill acquisition — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.