Claims

Profile structures and transitions over time largely align with common descriptions of interest development

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Longitudinal examination of the profiles and their transitions over three months largely aligns with common descriptions of interest development. → Akkerman 2020

Evidence

Akkerman 2020

Akkerman, D. M., Vulperhorst, J. P., & Akkerman, S. F. (2020). A developmental extension to the multidimensional structure of interests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000361

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Longitudinal evaluation of the six profiles identified at two time points three months apart, assessing transitions against developmental theory of interest. The article reports alignment is partial ("largely align"), with no effect size printed.

"The structures of the profiles and the transitions between profiles over time largely align with common descriptions of interest development."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id profile-transitions-align-interest-development-theory
title Profile structures and transitions over time largely align with common descriptions of interest development
description Profile structures and transitions over time largely align with common descriptions of interest development
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — akkerman-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.