Claims

The interactive training program did not develop planning, locus of control, or self-confidence, which the authors attribute to prior knowledge and insufficient activities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Differences among groups on planning, locus of control, and self-confidence were not statistically significant, indicating the program did not develop these three skills. → Gheith and Aljaberi 2017

Evidence

Gheith and Aljaberi 2017

Eman Gheith & Nahil M. Aljaberi. (2017). The Effectiveness of an Interactive Training Program in Developing a Set of Non-Cognitive Skills in Students at University of Petra. International Education Studies, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p60

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Null findings on three of the six scale dimensions (Table 1 F-values 0.39, 0.5, and 0.64, all non-significant). The article attributes this to students' prior knowledge of these skills and insufficient development strategies.

"It is evident that the training program did not contribute to developing planning, locus of control, and self-confidence skills in students, in spite of it being highly imperative in achieving success and developing problem-solving skills which students will practice in the future."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.