No significant interaction between order of phases and type of instruction on conceptual knowledge in the Bayesian-reasoning replication¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i0 The hypothesized interaction (PS-Its outperforming all other conditions) was not significant. → Loibl 2024

Evidence¶

Loibl 2024¶

Loibl, K., & Leuders, T. (2024). Can failure be made productive also in Bayesian reasoning? A conceptual replication study. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09670-y

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

In the same 2×2 experiment (N = 75), the ANOVA on conceptual knowledge found no significant interaction between order of phases and type of instruction (F(1,71) = 0.84, p = .36, ηp² < 0.012), failing to support the hypothesis that PS-Its would outperform all other conditions; descriptively PS-Its scored highest (2.63 points, SD = 1.07).

"or the interaction (hypothesis 3: F (1,71) = 0.84, p = .36, ηp 2 < 0.012)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a Bayesian-reasoning replication, problem-solving prior to instruction (PS-I) showed no significant advantage over instruction-first (I-PS) on conceptual knowledge — related
• PS-I effects did not replicate in all domains: null sequence effects in Bayesian reasoning, javelin throwing, and inquiry-skill sequencing — a broader claim this one bears on
• PS-I sequence outperforms I-PS on conceptual knowledge only when instruction builds on student solutions — reports the opposite
• Including typical student solutions in explicit instruction showed no significant effect on conceptual knowledge in the Bayesian-reasoning replication — related
• No significant effect of order of phases on procedural knowledge in the Bayesian-reasoning replication — related