No significant effect of order of phases on procedural knowledge in the Bayesian-reasoning replication¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i0 I-PS conditions did not significantly outperform PS-I conditions on procedural knowledge outcome. → Loibl 2024

Evidence¶

Loibl 2024¶

Loibl, K., & Leuders, T. (2024). Can failure be made productive also in Bayesian reasoning? A conceptual replication study. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09670-y

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Because procedural knowledge scores deviated from normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk p < .001), a rank transformation test was run in the 2×2 experiment (N = 75), showing "no significant differences regarding the factor order of phases" (F(1,71) = 0.04, p = .84, ηp² = 0.001); equivalence was not tested.

"the rank transformation test revealed no significant differences regarding the factor order of phases (hypothesis 1b: F (1,71) = 0.04, p = .84, ηp 2 = 0.001)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a Bayesian-reasoning replication, problem-solving prior to instruction (PS-I) showed no significant advantage over instruction-first (I-PS) on conceptual knowledge — related
• PS-I effects did not replicate in all domains: null sequence effects in Bayesian reasoning, javelin throwing, and inquiry-skill sequencing — a broader claim this one bears on
• No significant interaction between order of phases and type of instruction on conceptual knowledge in the Bayesian-reasoning replication — related
• Productive Failure Improves Conceptual Learning — a broader claim this one bears on