Claims

Across two studies that differed in the duration of the initial problem-solving phase, the PS-I versus WS-I transfer advantage reversed

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoretical r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a study with a short initial phase, PS-I was less beneficial for transfer than WS-I; in a second study with a long initial phase, PS-I was more beneficial. The contrast is across two separate studies, and the article says a shared-sample study is needed to test whether duration explains it. → Katharina Loibl · Timo Leuders · Inga Glogger-Frey · Nikol Rummel 2025 q2 i? In the long-preparation study, PS-I was more beneficial for transfer than WS-I. → Katharina Loibl · Timo Leuders · Inga Glogger-Frey · Nikol Rummel 2025 (2)

Evidence

Katharina Loibl · Timo Leuders · Inga Glogger-Frey · Nikol Rummel 2025

Katharina Loibl · Timo Leuders · Inga Glogger-Frey · Nikol Rummel. (2025). CID: a framework for the cognitive analysis of composite instructional designs. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09665-9

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

The article reports Glogger-Frey et al.'s (2015) study with one problem-solving or worked-solution task before instruction on density/ratios, finding PS-I "less beneficial for transfer" than WS-I. The article contrasts it with the long-phase 2017 study, says the two differed only in phase duration, and notes that research with a shared sample is needed to test whether this cross-study comparison is valid.

"The results of the first study (Glogger-Frey et al., 2015; short PS1/WS1) revealed that PS-I was less beneficial for transfer than explaining the worked solution before instruction"

Katharina Loibl · Timo Leuders · Inga Glogger-Frey · Nikol Rummel 2025 (2)

Katharina Loibl · Timo Leuders · Inga Glogger-Frey · Nikol Rummel. (2025). CID: a framework for the cognitive analysis of composite instructional designs. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09665-9

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

The article reports Glogger-Frey et al.'s (2017) study with two problems in the initial phase, finding PS-I "more beneficial for transfer" than WS-I. The CID framework proposes, as a theoretical explanation rather than a tested result, that working on two problems in different contexts gives an opportunity for analogical encoding, so the intermediate knowledge should be more generalized.

"The second study, with the long problem-solving or worked-solution phase (Glogger-Frey et al., 2017), revealed that PS-I was more beneficial for transfer than explain-ing the worked solution before instruction (WS-I)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ps-phase-duration-reverses-ps-i-ws-i-transfer
title Across two studies that differed in the duration of the initial problem-solving phase, the PS-I versus WS-I transfer advantage reversed
description Across two studies that differed in the duration of the initial problem-solving phase, the PS-I versus WS-I transfer advantage reversed
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — katharina-loibl-timo-leuders-inga-glogger-frey-nikol-rummel-2025, katharina-loibl-timo-leuders-inga-glogger-frey-nikol-rummel-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.