Claims

All 29 comprehensive RAS curricula included simulation training, with VR simulation (n = 16), dry lab (n = 11), and wet lab/bio-tissue/cadaveric (n = 12) as the most common modalities.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? All 29 comprehensive RAS curricula included simulation training, with VR simulation (n = 16), dry lab (n = 11), and wet lab/bio-tissue/cadaveric (n = 12) as the most common modalities. → Kieslich Anna K. 2026

Evidence

Kieslich Anna K. 2026

Kieslich Anna K., Jardine Ruari, Ibrahim Hussain, Calvert Areeg, Walker Kenneth G., Walker Kim A., Watson Angus J. M. (2026). A systematic review of comprehensive Robotic-assisted surgical (RAS) curricula. Journal of Robotic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02962-6

q3 · i? · review · r3

The systematic review's synthesis of curricula elements across all 29 included curricula reports that "All curricula included simulation" with VR simulation (n = 16), dry lab (n = 11), and wet lab/bio-tissue/cadaveric (n = 12) as the most common modalities.

"All curricula included simulation; virtual reality (VR) (n = 16), dry lab (n = 11), wet lab/bio-tissue/cadaveric (n = 12) with multiple curricula including more than one modality."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.