READ 180 studies in Newark (NJ) and Memphis found no differences from control¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Studies of READ 180 in Newark (NJ) and Memphis found no differences in comparison to control groups. → READ 180 evidence summary 2012

Evidence¶

READ 180 evidence summary 2012¶

READ 180 evidence summary. (2012). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc

q3 · i? · review · r?

Two of the five included studies, in Newark (NJ) and Memphis, "found no differences" between READ 180 and control groups. No effect sizes or test statistics are printed for these studies.

"Studies in Newark (NJ) and Memphis found no differences."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Two READ 180 studies found statistically significant positive effects over control groups (Western Massachusetts +0.18; Milwaukee +0.14) — reports the opposite
• READ 180 shows a modest average effect size of +0.08 across five studies, qualifying it for a Strong evidence rating — related
• A Florida READ 180 study found positive outcomes for students at moderate risk but negative effects for students at high risk (average effect size +0.12) — related
• Teachers and principals reported satisfaction with READ 180 implementation and positive perceptions of its impacts, while recommending additional professional development — related
• READ 180® comprehension effects are inconsistent across cohorts within the same study — related