Claims

Two READ 180 studies found statistically significant positive effects over control groups (Western Massachusetts +0.18; Milwaukee +0.14)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 In comparison to control groups, the Western Massachusetts study found an effect size of +0.18 and the Milwaukee study found +0.14, both statistically significant positive effects. → READ 180 evidence summary 2012

Evidence

READ 180 evidence summary 2012

READ 180 evidence summary. (2012). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc

q3 · i1 · review · r?

Of the five included studies, two had "statistically significant positive effects in comparison to control groups": Western Massachusetts (effect size =+0.18) and Milwaukee (effect size =+0.14). These qualified READ 180 for the Strong category.

"These were studies in Western Massachusetts (effect size =+0.18) and Milwaukee (effect size =+0.14)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id read-180-significant-positive-effects-two-studies
title Two READ 180 studies found statistically significant positive effects over control groups (Western Massachusetts +0.18; Milwaukee +0.14)
description Two READ 180 studies found statistically significant positive effects over control groups (Western Massachusetts +0.18; Milwaukee +0.14)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — read-180-evidence-summary-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.