Claims

A Florida READ 180 study found positive outcomes for students at moderate risk but negative effects for students at high risk (average effect size +0.12)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 In one Florida study, READ 180 outcomes were positive for students at moderate risk but negative for students at high risk, with an average effect size of +0.12. → READ 180 evidence summary 2012

Evidence

READ 180 evidence summary 2012

READ 180 evidence summary. (2012). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc

q3 · i1 · review · r?

One of the five included studies, conducted in Florida, reported effects moderated by student risk level: "positive outcomes for students at moderate risk, but negative effects for students at high risk," averaging +0.12.

"A Florida study found positive outcomes for students at moderate risk, but negative effects for students at high risk, with an average effect size of +0.12."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id read-180-florida-effects-vary-by-risk-level
title A Florida READ 180 study found positive outcomes for students at moderate risk but negative effects for students at high risk (average effect size +0.12)
description A Florida READ 180 study found positive outcomes for students at moderate risk but negative effects for students at high risk (average effect size +0.12)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — read-180-evidence-summary-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.