READ 180® has positive effects on general literacy achievement for adolescent readers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Across six studies, READ 180® showed positive effects on general literacy achievement, with an average improvement index of +4 percentile points (range 0 to +7). → READ 180® 2016
q3 i? Three of six studies showed statistically significant positive effects and no study showed negative effects in this domain. → READ 180® 2016 (2)
Evidence¶
READ 180® 2016¶
READ 180®. (2016). What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report: Adolescent Literacy, Updated November 2016. U.S. Department of Education, What Works Clearinghouse. http://www.hmhco.com/products/read-180/
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
WWC summary table for general literacy achievement: positive effects rating, average improvement index +4 percentile points, range 0 to +7, six studies, 6,235 students, "Medium to large" extent of evidence.
"General literacy Positive effects +4 0 to +7 6 6,235 Medium to large"
READ 180® 2016 (2)¶
READ 180®. (2016). What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report: Adolescent Literacy, Updated November 2016. U.S. Department of Education, What Works Clearinghouse. http://www.hmhco.com/products/read-180/
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
The review's rating-criteria statement for general literacy achievement: impacts were "positive and statistically significant for three studies" and "no studies showed statistically significant or substantively important negative effects."
"the estimated impact of the intervention on outcomes in the general literacy achievement domain was positive and statistically significant for three studies, one of which meets WWC group design standards without reservations, and no studies showed statistically significant or substantively important negative effects."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- READ 180® shows no discernible effects on alphabetics for adolescent readers — related
- READ 180® has positive effects on reading comprehension for adolescent readers in grades 4–12 — related
- READ 180® has potentially positive effects on reading fluency for adolescent readers — related
- A Florida READ 180 study found positive outcomes for students at moderate risk but negative effects for students at high risk (average effect size +0.12) — related
- Teachers and principals reported satisfaction with READ 180 implementation and positive perceptions of its impacts, while recommending additional professional development — related
- Fast ForWord has no discernible effects on alphabetics and general literacy achievement and potentially positive effects on reading fluency and comprehension for adolescent learners — related
- WWC finds CIRC has potentially positive effects on general literacy achievement for adolescent learners (average improvement index +2 percentile points) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
read-180-positive-effects-general-literacy |
title |
READ 180® has positive effects on general literacy achievement for adolescent readers |
description |
READ 180® has positive effects on general literacy achievement for adolescent readers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — read-180-2016, read-180-2016-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.