Claims

Reading comprehension relates to sourcing in half of reviewed studies, with no age-based explanation for the split

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Eight of sixteen studies found a statistically significant relationship between reading comprehension and sourcing and eight did not. → Anmarkrud 2022 q3 i? Studies finding the relationship tended to have larger samples than studies that did not, with similar mean participant age. → Anmarkrud 2022 (2)

Evidence

Anmarkrud 2022

Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., Florit, E., & Mason, L. (2022). The Role of Individual Differences in Sourcing: a Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09640-7

q3 · i? · review · r3

The review's synthesis of 16 studies measuring reading comprehension against sourcing found an even split: "Eight studies found a statistically significant relationship between reading comprehension and sourcing... and eight did not". No pooled effect size was computed because measures and statistics varied across studies.

"Eight studies found a statistically significant relationship between reading comprehension and sourcing (e.g., Hahnel et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2019; Salmerón et al., 2020), and eight did not (e.g., Bråten, Brante, & Strømsø, 2018; Florit et al., 2019; Mason et al., 2017)."

Anmarkrud 2022 (2)

Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., Florit, E., & Mason, L. (2022). The Role of Individual Differences in Sourcing: a Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09640-7

q3 · i? · review · r3

Exploratory analysis of the 16 comprehension studies: mean age was similar between studies with (M age = 15.36) and without (M age = 15.11) a significant relationship, but "a trend towards somewhat larger samples" characterized the studies detecting the relationship, which the authors note can affect the p value.

"There was a trend towards somewhat larger samples in the studies with (M sample size = 139) than without (M sample size = 81.90) a statistically significant relationship, a difference that can obviously affect the p value."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id reading-comprehension-sourcing-mixed
title Reading comprehension relates to sourcing in half of reviewed studies, with no age-based explanation for the split
description Reading comprehension relates to sourcing in half of reviewed studies, with no age-based explanation for the split
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — anmarkrud-2022, anmarkrud-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.