Claims

Dual language programs showed uncertain effects on science achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The average effect of dual language programs on science achievement was not statistically significant (effect size 0.09, p=0.18). → sci-1

Evidence

sci-1

What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2023, December). Dual language programs. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/726

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The WWC's summary for the science achievement domain, from the Steele et al. (2017) randomized controlled trial, reports an effect size of 0.09 and improvement index +4 that was "No (p=0.18)" statistically significant, yielding an uncertain effects rating.

"End of 6 years of implementation (Steele et al., 2017) 814 students in grade 5 Multiple schools in Portland, Oregon 0.09 +4 No (p=0.18)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dual-language-programs-uncertain-science-effects
title Dual language programs showed uncertain effects on science achievement
description Dual language programs showed uncertain effects on science achievement
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sci-1

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.