Claims

Students and faculty value real-world examples in gateway math, but limited resources and training often lead to procedural instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students seek relevance to their lives, fields of study, and future careers, while constraints such as limited textbook examples, lack of industry experience, and time pressures push faculty toward standard procedural problems. → Higgin 2025

Evidence

Higgin 2025

Higgin, T., Holl-Cross, C., Moorjani, A., & Edwards, A., with Cornfield, O., Eisen, S., Hosie, L., McNamara, H., Ray, D., & Tsinnajinnie, B. (2025). Faculty and student perspectives on gateway math courses and courseware. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED677594

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Secondary qualitative finding from the gateway math study of faculty and student experiences. The report states that "limited resources and training for faculty often lead to procedural instruction" despite valuing real-world examples.

"Students and faculty recognize the importance of real-world examples in gateway math, but limited resources and training for faculty often lead to procedural instruction instead of instruction focused on practical applications."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id real-world-relevance-gateway-math-procedural-instruction
title Students and faculty value real-world examples in gateway math, but limited resources and training often lead to procedural instruction
description Students and faculty value real-world examples in gateway math, but limited resources and training often lead to procedural instruction
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — higgin-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.