Claims

Reciprocal teaching produced significantly more favourable attitudes towards Islamic culture than the traditional method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Post-teaching attitude-scale scores differed significantly in favour of the experimental group, with a reported magnitude effect (η²) of 0.70. → Al-Harby 2016

Evidence

Al-Harby 2016

Al-Harby, J. S. S. (2016). The Effect of Reciprocal-Teaching Strategy on Learning Outcomes and Attitudes of Qassim-University Students in "Islamic Culture". Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092493

q2 · i3 · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental post-test comparison on the attitude scale after three weeks of teaching; the experimental group mean was 99.62 versus 81.97 for the control, t-test significant with magnitude effect η² = 0.70. The article concludes "The magnitude effect is big. This shows the effectiveness of the strategy in rendering its targets."

"Total Control 40 81,97 7,15 78 13,76 Significant 0,70 Experimental 40 99,62 3,81"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.