Encoding P3 amplitude is reduced in ADHD adolescents during visual WM encoding, in both early and late time windows¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 The early encoding P3 segment (320–430 ms) showed larger amplitude in the non-ADHD group than in the ADHD group. → Ortega 2020
q3 i3 The late encoding P3 segment (430–600 ms) was also larger in the non-ADHD group, and larger for the Color-Shape condition. → Ortega 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Ortega 2020¶
Ortega, R., López, V., Carrasco, X., Escobar, M. J., García, A. M., Parra, M. A. & Aboitiz, F. (2020). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying working memory encoding and retrieval in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Scientific Reports 10:7771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64678-x
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
ERP analysis of the encoding period in the EEG session with the same 36 adolescents: the early P3 window "exhibited larger amplitude in the non-ADHD group than in the ADHD", F(1,34)=5.3294, p = 0.02718, η2 = 0.14, with no condition effect or interaction.
"The earlier segment of this component, between 320 to 430 ms, exhibited larger amplitude in the non-ADHD group than in the ADHD (F (1,34)=5.3294, p = 0.02718, η2 = 0.14)"
Ortega 2020 (2)¶
Ortega, R., López, V., Carrasco, X., Escobar, M. J., García, A. M., Parra, M. A. & Aboitiz, F. (2020). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying working memory encoding and retrieval in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Scientific Reports 10:7771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64678-x
q3 · i3 · associational · r2
Same encoding ERP analysis: the late P3 window (430–600 ms) was larger in the non-ADHD group, F(1,34)=6.4352, p = 0.01595, η2 = 0.16, and larger for the Color-Shape condition, F(1,34)=5.8871, p = 0.02071, η2 = 0.15.
"The later part of this positivity (430–600) also showed larger amplitude in the non-ADHD (F(1,34)=6.4352, p = 0.01595, η2 = 0.16), and larger amplitudes for the Color-shape condition (F(1,34)=5.8871, p = 0.02071, η2 = 0.15)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Adolescents with ADHD show poorer accuracy than non-ADHD peers on all conditions of a visual short-term memory task, with the largest drop on trials requiring WM updating — related
- Adolescents with ADHD respond more slowly than non-ADHD peers across all conditions, and color-shape binding slows responses in both groups — related
- Retrieval P3 discriminates Same from Different trials only in non-ADHD adolescents, indicating a failure of post-selection prioritization in ADHD — related
- Visual WM binding of color and shape is intact in ADHD: no group differences behaviorally or electrophysiologically, with Bayesian support for null Group x Condition interactions — reports the opposite
- Encoding and retrieval P3 amplitudes are significantly correlated only in non-ADHD adolescents, though the between-group difference in correlations was not statistically discriminative — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reduced-encoding-p3-adhd |
title |
Encoding P3 amplitude is reduced in ADHD adolescents during visual WM encoding, in both early and late time windows |
description |
Encoding P3 amplitude is reduced in ADHD adolescents during visual WM encoding, in both early and late time windows |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ortega-2020, ortega-2020-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.