Regression analysis showed creativity score was not dependent on active play¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Regression analysis of the impact of active play on creativity showed TCT-DP was not dependent on active play. → Piya-amornphan N 2020

Evidence¶

Piya-amornphan N 2020¶

Piya-amornphan N, Santiworakul A, Cetthakrikul S, Srirug P. (2020). Physical activity and creativity of children and youths. BMC Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-2017-2

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Regression analysis examining the impact of active play on the TCT-DP creativity score reported that "TCT-DP was not depended on active play"; the result is in Supplementary Table 2 and no coefficient or effect size is printed in the provided text.

"Impact of active play on creativity was analyzed by using regression analysis. It was showed that TCT-DP was not depended on active play (Supplementary Table 2)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Creativity — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Active play correlates with creativity (TCT-DP score) in adolescents aged 14–17, but not in children aged 6–13 — reports the opposite
• Joint narratives after augmented play were rated more creative, and per-child creativity correlated with cooperative play (r = 0.72) and negatively with parallel play — related
• TCT-DP creativity scores increase with age group, and adolescents are the most sedentary — related
• Active play is associated with time with family and peers in all age groups (r = 0.485) — related
• In a multiple regression model, vigorous physical activity significantly accounts for 4.5% of variance in overall creativity — related