Related decorative pictures do not enhance transfer performance in either experiment (null results for correctness and metacognitive monitoring)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 In Experiment 1, transfer performance did not differ between the pictures condition and the control condition. → Demian Scherer 2023
q3 i0 In Experiment 2, transfer performance and metacognitive monitoring of transfer items showed no significant differences between conditions. → Demian Scherer 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Demian Scherer 2023¶
Demian Scherer, Annika Verkühlen, Stephan Dutke. (2023). Effects of related decorative pictures on learning and metacognition. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09618-8
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
ANCOVA on percentage of correct transfer responses in Experiment 1 with prior knowledge as covariate found a null effect (ηp2 < .001); means were nearly identical across conditions.
"The analysis revealed no significant difference between the condition with (M = 67.45, SD = 16.44) and without related decorative pictures (M = 67.25, SD = 15.27), F(1, 68) < 0.01, p = .945, ηp2 < .001."
Demian Scherer 2023 (2)¶
Demian Scherer, Annika Verkühlen, Stephan Dutke. (2023). Effects of related decorative pictures on learning and metacognition. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09618-8
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
Experiment 2 transfer t-test showed no significant difference, d = 0.19; metacognitive measures for transfer items also showed no significant differences (AC t(54) = 0.15, DIS t(54) = 0.67).
"The corresponding analysis of transfer performance also showed no significant difference in performance between the condition with pictures (M = 56.55, SD = 12.61) and the control condition (M = 54.07, SD = 13.09), t(54) = 0.72, p = .474, d = 0.19."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Decorative pictures show consistently null effects on elementary schoolers' word problem-solving performance regardless of task characteristics — related
- Related decorative pictures do not increase triggered or maintained situational interest; in Experiment 2 they reduced maintained interest — related
- Related decorative pictures improve metacognitive monitoring accuracy for knowledge items in eighth-graders (Experiment 2), but not for transfer items — related
- Reading a text with related decorative pictures yields more correct answers to knowledge items than reading the text without pictures (Experiment 1, university students) — related
- Decorative pictures in test items show no meaningful effect on performance, time on task, or metacognition compared to text-only items — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
related-decorative-pictures-no-transfer-effect |
title |
Related decorative pictures do not enhance transfer performance in either experiment (null results for correctness and metacognitive monitoring) |
description |
Related decorative pictures do not enhance transfer performance in either experiment (null results for correctness and metacognitive monitoring) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — demian-scherer-2023, demian-scherer-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.