Claims

First-pass recall accuracy rises while trials-to-criterion and exposure duration fall across the three weekly relearning sessions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 First-pass recall accuracy in the relearn condition increased across the three weekly practice sessions, from M = .24 in Session 1 to M = .68 in Session 2. → Philip A. Higham 2020 q2 i3 Mean exposure duration per question decreased across sessions, from M = 37.05 s in Session 1 to M = 27.22 s in Session 2. → Philip A. Higham 2020 (2)

Evidence

Philip A. Higham 2020

Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

One-way repeated-measures ANOVA with session as the independent variable tested first-pass recall in the relearn condition across the three weekly practice sessions. Accuracy was "lowest in the first session" and "greatly increased in the second session (M = .68; SD = .16)".

"recall accuracy was lowest in the first session (M = .24; SD = .14), greatly increased in the second session (M = .68; SD = .16), F(1, 211) = 1860.66, p < .001, ηp2 = .898"

Philip A. Higham 2020 (2)

Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

Repeated-measures ANOVA on mean exposure duration in the relearn condition across sessions. Exposure "was highest in the first session (M = 37.05; SD = 4.43), greatly reduced in the second session (M = 27.22; SD = 4.70)".

"exposure duration was highest in the first session (M = 37.05; SD = 4.43), greatly reduced in the second session (M = 27.22; SD = 4.70), F(1, 211) = 2003.33, p < .001, ηp2 = .905"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id relearning-session-gains-recall-trials-exposure
title First-pass recall accuracy rises while trials-to-criterion and exposure duration fall across the three weekly relearning sessions
description First-pass recall accuracy rises while trials-to-criterion and exposure duration fall across the three weekly relearning sessions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — philip-a-higham-2020, philip-a-higham-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.