First-pass recall accuracy rises while trials-to-criterion and exposure duration fall across the three weekly relearning sessions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 First-pass recall accuracy in the relearn condition increased across the three weekly practice sessions, from M = .24 in Session 1 to M = .68 in Session 2. → Philip A. Higham 2020
q2 i3 Mean exposure duration per question decreased across sessions, from M = 37.05 s in Session 1 to M = 27.22 s in Session 2. → Philip A. Higham 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Philip A. Higham 2020¶
Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
One-way repeated-measures ANOVA with session as the independent variable tested first-pass recall in the relearn condition across the three weekly practice sessions. Accuracy was "lowest in the first session" and "greatly increased in the second session (M = .68; SD = .16)".
"recall accuracy was lowest in the first session (M = .24; SD = .14), greatly increased in the second session (M = .68; SD = .16), F(1, 211) = 1860.66, p < .001, ηp2 = .898"
Philip A. Higham 2020 (2)¶
Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
Repeated-measures ANOVA on mean exposure duration in the relearn condition across sessions. Exposure "was highest in the first session (M = 37.05; SD = 4.43), greatly reduced in the second session (M = 27.22; SD = 4.70)".
"exposure duration was highest in the first session (M = 37.05; SD = 4.43), greatly reduced in the second session (M = 27.22; SD = 4.70), F(1, 211) = 2003.33, p < .001, ηp2 = .905"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Aggregate judgments of learning shift from lower under relearning to higher under relearning across the three sessions — related
- Total exposure time per session was significantly lower in the relearn condition than in the restudy condition, ruling out an exposure confound — related
- Relearning-to-criterion designs confound distribution of practice with amount of second-session practice — related
- Self-rated attentional control improves for relearning relative to restudying from the second session onward — related
- Anxious affect and self-rated mastery start worse for relearning but reverse in favour of relearning by the third session — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
relearning-session-gains-recall-trials-exposure |
title |
First-pass recall accuracy rises while trials-to-criterion and exposure duration fall across the three weekly relearning sessions |
description |
First-pass recall accuracy rises while trials-to-criterion and exposure duration fall across the three weekly relearning sessions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — philip-a-higham-2020, philip-a-higham-2020-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.