Treatment-group students increased significantly more than Delayed Treatment students on math-in-science-context tasks from pretest to midtest and pretest to posttest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students whose teachers taught GC/CoV-rich units first showed significantly greater pre-to-mid and pre-to-post improvement on math-in-science-context assessment tasks than students who taught those units later. → McElhaney 2025
Evidence¶
McElhaney 2025¶
McElhaney, K. W., Hodkowski, N. M., McMahon, L. H., Jacobs, J., Penuel, W. R., Anton, G., Henson, K., Urban, R., & Parker, D. A. (2025). Promoting Mathematical Reasoning in OpenSciEd Middle School Curriculum Units. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/4ea4b3c5-c663-4484-8727-258bff346d2d doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/281
q2 · i? · causal · r2
A delayed-treatment quasi-experiment in which teachers taught GC/CoV-rich or GC/CoV-lean OpenSciEd units in different orders, with a student mathematics assessment at three time points. The report states that "Treatment students increased significantly more from pre-to-mid and from pre-to-post than Delayed Treatment students." No effect size is printed.
"on the math-in-science-context tasks, Treatment students increased significantly more from pre-to-mid and from pre-to-post than Delayed Treatment students (Figure 3)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Delayed Treatment teachers more frequently simplified GC/CoV-lean lessons in ways that removed opportunities for figuring out, while Treatment teachers added graphing-skill opportunities — related
- The two teacher groups did not differ on released-math tasks; both groups made pretest-to-posttest gains, suggesting math-in-science-context tasks better capture OpenSciEd math reasoning — related
- Many teachers' knowledge of students' GC and CoV increased in sophistication over the school year, and teachers reported the professional learning and just-in-time supports were helpful — related
- Teachers addressed graph comprehension consistently at high levels across observed lessons, while covariational reasoning enactment varied widely by lesson — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
treatment-greater-gains-math-in-science-context-tasks |
title |
Treatment-group students increased significantly more than Delayed Treatment students on math-in-science-context tasks from pretest to midtest and pretest to posttest |
description |
Treatment-group students increased significantly more than Delayed Treatment students on math-in-science-context tasks from pretest to midtest and pretest to posttest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mcelhaney-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.