Claims

Whether EF gains are seen depends on the amount of time children spend doggedly practicing and pushing themselves to improve

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? EF gains depend on time spent doggedly working on the skills, pushing to improve, consistent with deliberate-practice accounts. → Diamond Adele 2012

Evidence

Diamond Adele 2012

Diamond Adele. (2012). Activities and Programs That Improve Children's Executive Functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412453722

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative review principle attributed to Klingberg et al. (2005) and framed as consistent with Ericsson's deliberate-practice findings and Vygotsky's zone of proximal development; no effect size is printed.

"Whether EF gains are seen depends on the amount of time children spend doggedly working on these skills, pushing themselves to improve (Klingberg et al., 2005)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id repeated-practice-key-ef-gains
title Whether EF gains are seen depends on the amount of time children spend doggedly practicing and pushing themselves to improve
description Whether EF gains are seen depends on the amount of time children spend doggedly practicing and pushing themselves to improve
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — diamond-adele-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.