Claims

EF training demands must keep increasing as children improve, or few gains will be seen

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? EF demands need to keep increasing as children's EFs improve, or few gains will be seen. → Diamond Adele 2012

Evidence

Diamond Adele 2012

Diamond Adele. (2012). Activities and Programs That Improve Children's Executive Functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412453722

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative review principle attributed to three training studies; the review offers two proposed reasons: people stop improving without pushing, and constant difficulty becomes boring, which the review says has been a criticism of Cogmed control conditions.

"EF demands need to keep increasing as children's EFs improve, or few gains will be seen (Bergman Nutley et al., 2011; Holmes et al., 2009; Klingberg et al., 2005)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id progressive-challenge-ef-training
title EF training demands must keep increasing as children improve, or few gains will be seen
description EF training demands must keep increasing as children improve, or few gains will be seen
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — diamond-adele-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.