Claims

After the experimental system of specialized courses, engineering students' research competency levels were high versus their levels at the initial stage

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students' research competency levels after final evaluation were high compared with their levels at the initial stage of the experiment. → Kozlo 2018

Evidence

Kozlo 2018

Kozlo, A. V., & Shemshurina, S. A. (2018). Fostering Creativity in Engineering Universities: Research Activity and Curriculum Policy. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 93-106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1191553

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pedagogical experiment conducted 2013-2017 at the November Institute of Oil and Gas with 150 students in Technology of Transport Processes; pre- and post-tests of research competency were compared. The article reports "research competency levels of students were high versus" initial levels, with knowledge described as more systematic, complete and stronger.

"After final evaluation, research competency levels of students were high versus the research competency levels of students at the initial stage."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.