Claims

The intervention produced significant gains on each of the ten targeted protective factors of resilience

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Mean gain scores differed significantly between experimental and control groups on every one of the ten protective factors measured. → Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza 2017

Evidence

Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza 2017

Muhammad Irfan Arif and Munawar S. Mirza. (2017). Effectiveness of an Intervention Program in Fostering Academic Resilience of Students at Risk of Failure at Secondary School Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 251-264. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1210192

q3 · i? · causal · r2

By-factor t-tests on gain scores of the same 64-student pretest-posttest control group experiment. Each factor (creativity, self-esteem, self-efficacy, internal locus of control, problem solving, autonomy, sense of humor, stress coping, sense of purpose, teacher-student relationship) showed "significant difference" with p = .001 and df = 62; experimental gains ranged from 6.62 to 8.07 versus control gains of 0.58 to 1.92.

"Table 6 indicates significant difference between the mean gain scores of the control and experimental groups’ students on each of the ten factors of resilience."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.