Response duration decreased significantly across the five training sessions in both conditions¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Participants became significantly faster across training sessions regardless of condition. → Manuel Ninaus 2023

Evidence¶

Manuel Ninaus 2023¶

Manuel Ninaus, Rodolpho Cortez, Izabel Hazin, Kristian Kiili, Silke M. Wortha, Elise Klein, Elisabeth M. Weiss, Korbinian Moeller. (2023). The added value of game elements: better training performance but comparable learning gains. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10263-8

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Linear mixed model predicting response duration across five training sessions for 85 participants. The article reports "participants became significantly faster across training sessions" (p < 0.001) with Std. beta = − 0.28; no standardized effect size such as d was printed.

"The effect of training session was statistically significant indicating that participants became significantly faster across training sessions (beta = − 186.55, 95% CI [− 237.79, − 135.32], t(417) = − 7.14, p < 0.001; Std. beta = − 0.28, 95% CI [− 0.36, − 0.21])"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Participants in the game-based training condition took more time to respond during training than participants in the non-game-based condition — related
• Students become faster and more accurate in equation rearrangement over a short practice session even without feedback — related