Claims

Socio-cultural and strategic component scores rose substantially at re-testing (87% value ranking, 58% traditions, 86% strategies, 82% social)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At re-testing, value-ranking/judgment tasks reached 87%, traditions and customs 58%, communicative strategies 86%, and social/socio-cultural component 82%. → Fahrutdinova 2014

Evidence

Fahrutdinova 2014

Fahrutdinova, R. A., Yarmakeev, I. E., & Fakhrutdinov, R. R. (2014). The Formation of Students’ Foreign Language Communicative Competence during the Learning Process of the English Language through Interactive Learning Technologies (The Study on the Basis of Kazan Federal University). English Language Teaching, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n12p36

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Control-phase re-testing of the socio-cultural and strategic components. Value ranking reached 87% (up from 67%), traditions/customs 58% (up from 34%), strategies 86% (up from 62%), and the social/socio-cultural component 82% (up from 55%); the article notes the greatest development in the experimental group. No effect sizes are printed.

"The good result was received while perf orming the tasks not requiring a defin ite answer on testing sociocultural competence, i.e. allowing a certain amount of subjectivity: on the ranking of values and valuation judgments (87% correct answers)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.