Interactive learning technologies produced greater gains in foreign language communicative competence than traditional instruction in a 54-student quasi-experiment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group showed the greatest increase in communicative competence compared with the control group over the school year. → Fahrutdinova 2014
Evidence¶
Fahrutdinova 2014¶
Fahrutdinova, R. A., Yarmakeev, I. E., & Fakhrutdinov, R. R. (2014). The Formation of Students’ Foreign Language Communicative Competence during the Learning Process of the English Language through Interactive Learning Technologies (The Study on the Basis of Kazan Federal University). English Language Teaching, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n12p36
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Re-testing at the end of the school year compared the experimental group taught with interactive technologies against the control group taught traditionally. The article reports both groups grew, but "the greatest increase is observed in the experimental group". No effect size or test statistic is printed.
"Therefore, the average level of th e development of communicative competence has grown in both study groups. However, the greatest increase is observed in the experimental group comparing with the control one."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Linguistic-component scores rose to 79% (vocabulary) and 94% (grammar) at re-testing, with the largest gains in the experimental group — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Socio-cultural and strategic component scores rose substantially at re-testing (87% value ranking, 58% traditions, 86% strategies, 82% social) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- CALL instruction produced significantly better TOEIC listening score gains than traditional textbook instruction in a quasi-experiment with two groups of 25 Vietnamese college students — related
- University students in a blended learning German course showed significantly greater achievement gains than students in a traditional face-to-face course over 10 weeks — related
- Baseline testing showed weak discursive (32%) and socio-cultural knowledge (34%) but stronger strategic (62%) and value-ranking (67%) performance — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Practical competencies-oriented teaching materials with supplementary local cases produce significantly better learning achievement than traditional lecture in a Human Resource Management unit — related
- Flipped classroom instruction produced significantly better post-test writing scores than traditional instruction among Iraqi EFL sophomores — related
- Vocabulary instruction with the educational marble game produced significantly higher adjusted post-test scores than traditional instruction in a German second-foreign-language course — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.