Retrograde intervention experiments—reversing LTP or depotentiating learning-strengthened synapses—cause memory loss, lending strong support to the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Treatments known to reverse LTP (ZIP, dominant-negative PKMζ, optogenetic depotentiation) cause memory loss or amnesia across a range of tasks, including selective effects on one of two memories sharing overlapping ensembles. → Wickliffe C. Abraham 2019
Evidence¶
Wickliffe C. Abraham 2019¶
Wickliffe C. Abraham, Owen D. Jones and David L. Glanzman. (2019). Is plasticity of synapses the mechanism of long-term memory storage? npj Science of Learning 4:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0048-y
q2 · i? · review · r3
Narrative review attributing retrograde intervention findings to multiple cited studies. The review reports that LTP-reversing treatments "cause memory loss across a range of tasks", and that input-specific LTP occurs in the amygdala during discriminative fear learning with depotentiation of those synapses causing memory loss.
"administration of zeta-inhibitory-peptide (ZIP) as well as over-expression of a dominant-negative PKM ζ, treatments known to reverse LTP, cause memory loss across a range of tasks"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- LTP exhibits electrophysiological properties that make it an attractive candidate memory mechanism, including rapid induction, persistence up to at least a year, and greater persistence with spaced than massed induction protocols — related
- Memories can persist and be reinstated in the absence of learning-induced synaptic alterations, supporting cell-intrinsic storage — reports the opposite
- Transfer of memory via RNA injection in Aplysia—trained donor RNA enhanced the siphon-withdrawal reflex in untrained recipients—offers the strongest challenge to date to the synaptic plasticity hypothesis — reports the opposite
- DNMT inhibitors block memory formation and/or consolidation and disrupt well-consolidated memory, implicating DNA methylation in memory processes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
retrograde-intervention-supports-spm-hypothesis |
title |
Retrograde intervention experiments—reversing LTP or depotentiating learning-strengthened synapses—cause memory loss, lending strong support to the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis |
description |
Retrograde intervention experiments—reversing LTP or depotentiating learning-strengthened synapses—cause memory loss, lending strong support to the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wickliffe-c-abraham-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.