Transfer of memory via RNA injection in Aplysia—trained donor RNA enhanced the siphon-withdrawal reflex in untrained recipients—offers the strongest challenge to date to the synaptic plasticity hypothesis¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Untrained Aplysia injected with RNA from sensitization-trained donors showed significant enhancement of the siphon-withdrawal reflex, an effect blocked by a DNMT inhibitor; sensory neurons incubated in trained donor RNA showed enhanced excitability, with no effect on motor neurons. → Wickliffe C. Abraham 2019
Evidence¶
Wickliffe C. Abraham 2019¶
Wickliffe C. Abraham, Owen D. Jones and David L. Glanzman. (2019). Is plasticity of synapses the mechanism of long-term memory storage? npj Science of Learning 4:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0048-y
q2 · i? · review · r3
Narrative review attributing this experiment to Bédécarrats et al. Tail-shock-trained donors' RNA was injected into untrained recipients; recipients of trained donor RNA showed significant SWR enhancement while untrained donor RNA recipients did not. The effect depended on DNA methylation, blocked by RG108.
"When tested 24 h post-injection, the animals that received the trained donor RNA exhibited significant enhancement of the SWR, whereas the recipients of the untrained donor RNA did not"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- DNMT inhibitors block memory formation and/or consolidation and disrupt well-consolidated memory, implicating DNA methylation in memory processes — related
- Memories can persist and be reinstated in the absence of learning-induced synaptic alterations, supporting cell-intrinsic storage — related
- Retrograde intervention experiments—reversing LTP or depotentiating learning-strengthened synapses—cause memory loss, lending strong support to the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis — reports the opposite
- Non-coding RNAs participate in learning and memory: microRNAs in fear-related learning and memory, and long non-coding RNAs regulated by experience in behavioural adaptation, as the review reports — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
rna-transfer-memory-aplysia-challenges-synaptic-hypothesis |
title |
Transfer of memory via RNA injection in Aplysia—trained donor RNA enhanced the siphon-withdrawal reflex in untrained recipients—offers the strongest challenge to date to the synaptic plasticity hypothesis |
description |
Transfer of memory via RNA injection in Aplysia—trained donor RNA enhanced the siphon-withdrawal reflex in untrained recipients—offers the strongest challenge to date to the synaptic plasticity hypothesis |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wickliffe-c-abraham-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.