Claims

R-I-Z-A-based assessment found satisfactory qualitative outcomes: 86% improvement in resources, 81% excellent interpretation performance, and 76% able to produce a medial message

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 3 of 3 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Comparing beginning and end of the trial, the resources component showed a significant improvement (86%), especially in identifying key concepts, their definition and linking. → Feola 2016 q2 i? 81% of participants achieved excellent performance levels in analysing a media text, giving value judgments on the medial relationship, recognising private emotions and narrating the experience. → Feola 2016 (2) q2 i? By the end, 76% of learners could produce a medial message using media linguistic rules, 72% could discriminate facts and actions from personal opinions, and 80% could select relevant information discarding the superfluous. → Feola 2016 (3)

Evidence

Feola 2016

Elvia Ilaria Feola. (2016). Digital Literacy and New Technological Perspectives. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(9): 2174-2180. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040929

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative R-I-Z-A assessment of the same 162-student one-group e-learning course, comparing competence profiles at the beginning and end of the trial. The article reports "a significant improvement (86%)" in the resources component, keyed to identifying, defining and linking key concepts. The percentage is descriptive.

"taking into consideration the evaluation of resources, implementing a comparison on the digital skills of learners at the beginning of the trial and the end, you can highlight a significant improvement (86%), especially as regards the identification of the key concepts, their definition and the linking."

Feola 2016 (2)

Elvia Ilaria Feola. (2016). Digital Literacy and New Technological Perspectives. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(9): 2174-2180. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040929

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Interpretation-structures component of the R-I-Z-A evaluation, based on the difference of perceptions students expressed at the beginning and end of the experiment. The article reports that "81% of participants achieved excellent performance levels" across media-text analysis, value judgments, emotion recognition and narration.

"It was found that 81% of participants achieved excellent performance levels in analyzing a media text, to provide value judgments on the medial relationship, recognizing the private emotions and in narrating the experience."

Feola 2016 (3)

Elvia Ilaria Feola. (2016). Digital Literacy and New Technological Perspectives. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(9): 2174-2180. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040929

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Action-structures component of the R-I-Z-A evaluation, derived from differences in learners' ability to design a media product or apply a storytelling model. The article additionally reports that 72% could discriminate facts and actions from personal opinions and 80% could select relevant information, discarding the superfluous.

"The 76% of the learners, at the end of the experiment is capable of producing a medial message using the media linguistic rules and evaluate a message."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.