Claims

The gain (enhancement) in critical mathematical thinking skills is larger under culture-based RME than under conventional education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Normalized gain in critical thinking was 0.47 for RME versus 0.40 for conventional education, both classified as moderate upgrades, t-test sig. 0.000. → Palinussa 2013

Evidence

Palinussa 2013

Palinussa, A. L. (2013). Students' Critical Mathematical Thinking Skills and Character: Experiments for Junior High School Students through Realistic Mathematics Education Culture-Based. IndoMS Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 75-94. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpm

q2 · i? · causal · r2

T-test analysis of enhancement (gain) scores in the quasi-experiment; both gains are described as "moderate upgrades" and Table 4 reports the t-test significance as 0.000. No standardized effect size is printed.

"results enhancement students' critical thinking skills mathematical who have been using RME (0. 47) is better than the enhancement students' critical thinking skills mathematical who have been using Conventional Mathematics Education (0.40)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.