Claims

Students taught with culture-based RME show better character than students taught with conventional mathematics education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Overall character scores were 74.97 for RME versus 67.84 for conventional education (t-test sig. 0.000), and differences by early math skill level were also significant (ANOVA sig. 0.007). → Palinussa 2013

Evidence

Palinussa 2013

Palinussa, A. L. (2013). Students' Critical Mathematical Thinking Skills and Character: Experiments for Junior High School Students through Realistic Mathematics Education Culture-Based. IndoMS Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 75-94. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpm

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Character was measured with a perception scale in the same quasi-experiment (Table 6). Table 7 reports the t-test significance as 0.000 for learning group and One-Way ANOVA sig. 0.007 for early math skills. RME character means rose from 72.96 (low early math skills) to 84.52 (high).

"t -test analysis produces the students' character who have been using RME (74.97 out of 100) is better than the students' character who have been using Conventional Mathematics Education (67.84). Both characters are quite good"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.