Claims

Junior high students taught with culture-based RME achieve higher post-test critical mathematical thinking scores than students taught with conventional mathematics education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test critical thinking scores were significantly higher for the RME culture-based group (60.48 of 100) than the conventional group (51.56 of 100), t-test sig. 0.000. → Palinussa 2013

Evidence

Palinussa 2013

Palinussa, A. L. (2013). Students' Critical Mathematical Thinking Skills and Character: Experiments for Junior High School Students through Realistic Mathematics Education Culture-Based. IndoMS Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 75-94. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpm

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study with control class of 106 grade 7 students in two Ambon junior high schools; t-test on post-test critical thinking scores showed a difference, with the RME group classified medium and the conventional group low. The article reports "Uji-t 0.000" in Table 2.

"further analysis on the whole there is a difference in post test of critical thinking skills mathematical between students who were treated with RME culture-based (60.48 out of 100) better then students who treated with conventional learning (51.56 of 100)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.