Smaller response-time differences between incongruent and congruent trials (better inhibition) correlate with higher mathematics scores¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Children with a smaller RT difference between correctly answered incongruent and congruent trials scored higher on the mathematics achievement test (r = -.27). → Gilmore C 2013
Evidence¶
Gilmore C 2013¶
Gilmore C, Attridge N, Clayton S, Cragg L, Johnson S, Marlow N, Simms V, Inglis M. (2013). Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement. PLoS ONE 8(6): e67374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067374
q3 · i2 · associational · r2
Experiment 1 correlational analysis treating the RT difference between trial types as an index of inhibition skill. Children with "good inhibition skills" showed higher Woodcock-Johnson III calculation scores (r = -.27, p = .015).
"Children with a smaller RT difference between correctly answered incongruent and congruent trials, and thus good inhibition skills, scored higher on the mathematics achievement test than children with a larger RT difference (r = -.27, p = .015)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Flanker task produces congruency effects in reaction time and accuracy in twelve-year-old children — related
- Interference suppression, but not response inhibition, relates to academic achievement and schooling skills — related
- The association between nonsymbolic magnitude comparison and multiplication facts is similar across trial types (OTS/ANS range and congruency), and the symbolic comparison association is similar across numerical distances — related
- Incongruent items in school-topic tasks are generally associated with longer response times and lower accuracy, patterns consistent with inhibitory control recruitment — related
- Congruency effects on both numerical and non-numerical inhibition tasks occur in all three age groups, with an age-by-congruency interaction only on the numerical task — related
- Effortful control positively predicts academic achievement and schooling skills in twelve-year-old children — related
- Better semantic inhibition (smaller Stroop RT cost) is associated with higher accuracy on counterintuitive science and maths misconception trials — related
- Reanalysis of previously-published data replicates the incongruent-trial pattern in children, with a marginal effect in adults — related
- Incongruent dot comparison trials are less accurate and slower than congruent trials, consistent with an added inhibition step — related
- The correlation between dot comparison performance and children's mathematics achievement is driven by incongruent, not congruent, trials — related
- Verbal working memory positively and inhibitory control negatively relate to accuracy in the contrasting multiple-choice task — related
- Both text incongruency and knowledge inaccuracy produce increased reading times on target sentences — related
- Children's inhibitory control is positively related to math achievement as a main effect, independent of parental input — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
rt-congruency-difference-correlates-with-math |
title |
Smaller response-time differences between incongruent and congruent trials (better inhibition) correlate with higher mathematics scores |
description |
Smaller response-time differences between incongruent and congruent trials (better inhibition) correlate with higher mathematics scores |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gilmore-c-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.