Students' engagement in the SARA system increased significantly after the persuasive intervention was introduced, compared to the pre-intervention baseline.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Students' engagement scores in SARA, measured as average weekly view-events, were significantly higher during the persuasive intervention than before it. → Orji 2021

Evidence¶

Orji 2021¶

Orji, F. A., Greer, J., & Vassileva, J. (2021). Evaluating a Persuasive Intervention for Engagement in a Large University Class. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00260-4

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

A one-way within-subject ANOVA compared all students' SARA engagement before and during the intervention. The article reports "a statistically significant difference in the students’ engagement" with η2 = .596; mean weekly view-events rose from M = 0.54 before to M = 10.44 during the intervention.

"The results show a statistically significant difference in the students’ engagement (F1, 226 = 198.080,p = .0001,η2 = .596). The pairwise comparison results demonstrated that students were more engaged in the SARA system during the intervention than before the intervention,p = .0001."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students' engagement in the MindTap learning platform increased significantly across logins, time spent, and engagement score after the persuasive intervention was introduced. — related
• Personalizing persuasive strategies to students' susceptibility amplifies their effect on engagement in the SARA learning support system. — related
• Introducing socially-oriented persuasive strategies as social visualizations in a learning support system increases students' engagement in online learning activities. — related