Students' engagement in the MindTap learning platform increased significantly across logins, time spent, and engagement score after the persuasive intervention was introduced.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Students' engagement in MindTap increased significantly from before to during the persuasive intervention on all three measures: number of logins, time spent, and engagement score. → Orji 2021
Evidence¶
Orji 2021¶
Orji, F. A., Greer, J., & Vassileva, J. (2021). Evaluating a Persuasive Intervention for Engagement in a Large University Class. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00260-4
q3 · i3 · causal · r1
A one-way within-subject ANOVA tested the change in MindTap engagement before and during the intervention for 208 students. The article reports "statistically significant difference in students’ engagement in learning activities for all the three measures": number of logins (η2 = .774), time spent (η2 = .401), and engagement score (η2 = .944).
"The results show statistically significant difference in students’ engagement in learning activities for all the three measures: number of logins (F1,206 = 428.319, p = .0001, η2= .774), time spent (F1,206 = 98.610, p = .0001, η2 = .401), and engagement score (F1,206 = 2499.862, p = .0001,η2 = .944)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Motivation — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Introducing socially-oriented persuasive strategies as social visualizations in a learning support system increases students' engagement in online learning activities. — related
- The amplifying effect of personalized persuasive strategies on engagement was not statistically significant in the MindTap learning platform. — related
- Students' engagement in the SARA system increased significantly after the persuasive intervention was introduced, compared to the pre-intervention baseline. — related
- Personalizing persuasive strategies to students' susceptibility amplifies their effect on engagement in the SARA learning support system. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mindtap-engagement-increased-during-intervention |
title |
Students' engagement in the MindTap learning platform increased significantly across logins, time spent, and engagement score after the persuasive intervention was introduced. |
description |
Students' engagement in the MindTap learning platform increased significantly across logins, time spent, and engagement score after the persuasive intervention was introduced. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — orji-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.