The evidence base on SBAR-based simulation for nursing students comprises 12 studies with 886 participants, most rated weak in methodological quality¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Twelve studies (3 RCTs, 9 quasi-experimental) with 886 total participants were included; nine were rated weak, three moderate, and none strong on the EPHPP tool. → Yun Jungmi 2023

Evidence¶

Yun Jungmi 2023¶

Yun Jungmi, Lee Yun Ji, Kang Kyoungrim, Park Jongmin. (2023). Effectiveness of SBAR-based simulation programs for nursing students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04495-8

q3 · i? · review · r3

EPHPP quality appraisal of the 12 included studies by two independent reviewers. The review reports "nine studies were classified as weak, three as moderate, and none were classified as strong," with most weakness in selection bias (11 of 12) and blinding (nine studies).

"Of the 12 studies included in the present systematic review, nine studies were classified as weak, three as moderate [22, 24, 30], and none were classified as strong."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• SBAR-based simulation programs produce significant improvements in communication clarity for nursing students in six of twelve reviewed studies — related
• Effects of SBAR-based simulation on communication ability, critical thinking, confidence, learning self-efficacy, and attitude toward patient safety are divergent across studies — related
• Structured communication tools such as SBAR incorporated into simulation are associated with improved team coordination and information transfer — related