Claims

Effects of SBAR-based simulation on communication ability, critical thinking, confidence, learning self-efficacy, and attitude toward patient safety are divergent across studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Divergent results were obtained for communication ability, critical thinking, confidence, learning self-efficacy, and attitude toward patient safety. → Yun Jungmi 2023

Evidence

Yun Jungmi 2023

Yun Jungmi, Lee Yun Ji, Kang Kyoungrim, Park Jongmin. (2023). Effectiveness of SBAR-based simulation programs for nursing students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04495-8

q3 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of the 12 included studies' outcome measures, which included the CCS, GICC, VAS confidence, and critical thinking instruments. The review reports that "divergent results were obtained" across these non-clarity outcomes, with some individual studies reporting non-significant results (e.g., patient assessment, patient intervention, critical thinking in one RCT).

"Divergent results were obtained regarding communication ability, critical thinking, confidence, learning self-efficacy, and attitude toward patient safety."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.