Claims

Buddies and Buddy Leaders evaluated the SBS scheme very positively, with all 28 survey respondents agreeing sessions were an effective way to learn in a non-threatening environment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On a 21-item 5-point evaluation survey (n = 28), positive statements were overwhelmingly agreed to, including 100% agreement that sessions were effective in a non-threatening environment and assisted learning on a regular basis. → Thalluri 2014

Evidence

Thalluri 2014

Thalluri, Jyothi; O'Flaherty, Jackie A.; and Shepherd, Paul L. (2014). Classmate peer-coaching: "A Study Buddy Support scheme". Journal of Peer Learning, 7, 92-104. http://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol7/iss1/8

q2 · i? · design · r2

Anonymous end-of-semester evaluation with 21 closed-ended 5-point items and four open questions, completed by 28 of 141 Buddies and Buddy Leaders. Table 3 shows 100% agreement on items 14 and 19 and 96.5% agreement on several others.

"As is clearly demonstrated in Table 3, positive statements in the survey (response rate just under 20%) were overwhelmingly agreed to, with a negative reaction to only three questions by a single student, and very few providing a neutral response."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.